A blue roof is a flat roof or deck which is designed to provide controlled attenuation and management of rainfall to the sewer or outfall system, as part of a Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SuDS) proposal. This is particularly relevant on developments located in dense urban environments.
This guidance provides information to designers, developers and surveyors to assist in meeting the functional requirements of the Premier Guarantee Warranty Technical Manual where a blue roof is proposed on a project covered by our warranty.
This document includes:
The requirement of any roof or deck that is to be waterproofed is to protect the structure and space underneath from the ingress of water.
A blue roof is defined as a roof design that is explicitly intended to store rainfall temporarily at a level not exceeding the designed hydraulic head, for a defined period of time.
Therefore, blue roof systems manage rainfall by temporarily attenuating rainfall at a controlled predetermined rate and capacity before discharging into the rainwater sewers. Blue roofs may be classified as either ‘active’ or ‘passive’ depending on the types of control devices used to regulate drainage of water from the roof.
*Certain criteria need to be met by an appointed contractor in order to qualify as acceptable to our warranty, to design and install zero falls. Projects which propose elements of zero fall should be limited to inverted roofs and must be agreed in advance with the warranty provider at an early stage in the design and before the offer of warranty is made.
To satisfy our warranty requirements:
The design for a blue roof on a roof or deck slab must demonstrate:
For the design of a blue roof, reference to other associated technical standards may be appropriate.
If the space beneath the blue roof is situated below ground level, the design may require to be coordinated alongside a CSSW qualified structural waterproofing specialist
Design Information Submission Pack required: for warranty purposes, developers must provide information at the earliest opportunity and, it should be noted, only installers with a demonstrable history of installing blue roof systems are to be permitted.
A full design submission must include:
1. Written demonstration all other retention and within-site attenuation and release strategies have been explored before a blue roof has been proposed
2. A full set of section details detailing each proposed build up for the above-ground attenuation layers and blue roof areas and junctions with adjoining structures, including:
a) GA plan details for each above-ground attenuation surface area, noting build up types if these vary
b) GA plans and detail sections must show locations of movement joints proposed
c) Details of large obstructions such as planters, M&E equipment or similar and method to ensure water is diverted around these obstructions where applicable
3. Full details of component products used, including details of third party accreditation certification for all components of the all elements of complete proposed waterproofing and drainage system
4. Structural engineer’s design philosophy statement including but not limited to calculation of substrate deflection, design wind loads, supply of long-term deflection gradient drawings and required installation tolerances. The design team must also collaborate with the drainage consultant to demonstrate clearly that ponding or back falls will not occur
5. Drainage design drawings and peak flow calculations for entire slab including:
a) Drainage drawings must show position of outlets and multidirectional drainage flow available above waterproof membrane
b) Position of emergency overflow provision. The overflow facility with capacity to peak rainfall discharge rate (usually BSEN12056-3:2000 Cat 1 rainfall for that area). Overflows must be placed in a conspicuous location
c) Calculation of drainage load using a dynamic storage assessment method to find critical duration using FEH13 (preferred) or FSR rainfall data, and based on 1:100 year risk +40% climate change allowance. This method should examine a series of storm durations from five minutes to 48 hours, and for each one model inflow storage and outflow, to determine the storm, which creates the largest depth, and is thus the critical duration for that system
6. Waterproof membrane threshold detailing linked back to damp proof course which is to be 150mm above the datum of the highest level of attenuated water proposed in all circumstances
7. Detail for pipe penetrations through wall and floor and detail showing 150mm waterproofing upstand around penetrations which is to be 150mm above the datum of the highest level of attenuated water proposed in all circumstances
8. Details of locations of fixings into slab and detail showing waterproofing upstand around penetrations which is to be 150mm above the datum of the highest level of attenuated water proposed in all circumstances
9. Details of access and repair plan from the building management to address how remedial works could be undertaken in the event of a defect
10. Details of proposed maintenance strategy, including an undertaking from the building management to ensure that frequent maintenance to the above-ground attenuation surfaces are evidenced to be implemented
11. A condensation risk assessment through the roof, or otherwise demonstrate how the risk of condensation will be limited
12. Warm roofs only: isolation of rainwater outlet (RWO) from insulation:
a) Air and vapour control layer to be sealed to waterproof membrane at a square (plan) exclusion zone to all RWO
b) Zone to be not less than 250mm from RWO
13. Inverted roofs only: drainage discharge provision:
a) Provision for drainage at waterproof membrane level
b) Provision of clearly marked access to RWO, free of obstruction
14. Sufficient ballast to prevent insulation flotation
The introduction of a blue roof may have loading implications for the structure of the building. It is vital to consult a structural engineer at an early stage, especially when designing for a SuDS solution where water will be attenuated within the roof structure. For example, designing for heads of water and drainage from the roof can result in an uneven distribution load across the substrate.
Substrates constructed of reinforced concrete and correctly designed by a competent engineer have proven to be the most reliable, designed in accordance with BS EN 1992-1-1:2004 Design of Concrete Structures.
Other substrates will require specialist involvement to demonstrate that the substrate will be dimensionally stable and be suitable for a blue roof proposal.
Note: roof or deck slabs constructed using block and beam floors are not acceptable for blue roof substrate applications.
Where there is any risk for potential excessive movement as a result of the substrate selection or any subsequent usage of the deck area, the designer must ensure through clear evaluation and demonstration that the system is able to cope with the worst case anticipated movement to avoid inducing tensile and shearing stresses in the waterproof membrane.
All aspects of the design of the waterproofing membrane to conform to BS 6229:2018 Flat roofs with continuously supported flexible waterproof coverings – Code of Practice.
Fully bonded or monolithic systems are typically appropriate for above-ground attenuation surfaces such as those provided for blue roof waterproofing membranes. Any certified system MUST NOT allow ‘tracking’ of water between the substrate and the waterproof membrane.
Curing agents may, on occasion, be applied to the top surface of the concrete substrate to
a. enhance the concrete quality and durability
b. reduce the curing period
The curing agent essentially forms a membrane across the concrete surface of the laid concrete to increase the density of the cement paste and lower the porosity at the surface. This increases resistance to external influences, surface stresses and attack
Applied curing compounds are not always compatible with a proposed hot-melt application Adhesion may be reduced causing delamination from the substrate and potentially cause water to track under the waterproof layer following a membrane failure.
Compounds based on a sodium silicate are generally acceptable for a direct applied hot-melt waterproofing application. Adhesion reduction is likely when the base component of the curing agent is:
All systems provided must have third party product approval accreditation referencing the proposed use. In the selection of a system, where zero falls* are proposed, it should be only considered in connection with an inverted warm roof.
*As in 3. Design Considerations, certain criteria will need to be met by an appointed contractor in order to qualify as acceptable to our warranty, to design and install zero falls. Projects which propose elements of zero fall should be limited to inverted roofs and must be agreed in advance with the warranty provider at an early stage in the design and before the offer of warranty is made.
As soon as is practically possible, the waterproof membrane will require protection against damage from either follow on trades or the deck being used as material storage space.
Prior to applying surface finishes above the waterproof layer, the waterproof membrane must be integrity tested and verified by an independent third party. Additional testing may be required where by inspection there is potential that defects may have occurred as a result of damage from follow on trades or the deck being used as storage.
The waterproofing membrane must be linked to any cavity tray to avoid discontinuity resulting in moisture ingress.
It is important that the blue roof be effectively designed to adequately deal with the predicted rainwater for the construction geographical location. Analysis calculations to determine the drainage load using a dynamic storage assessment method to find the critical duration can be determined by using data models:
Analysis is based on 1:100-year risk + 40% climate change allowance. This method examines a series of storm durations from five minutes to 48 hours. Each model calculates flow storage and outflow to determine the storm which creates the largest depth becomes the critical duration for blue roof system.
A drainage design must be provided for the blue roof element by a suitably qualified and experienced engineer in accordance with BS EN 12056-3:2000.
The design is to specify the following:
The specified hydraulic head must never be exceeded and therefore drainage outlets must be designed and positioned to remove excess water.
Drainage from blue roofs should not discharge onto lower roof or decks.
The choice of outlet is critical in a blue roof construction. Rainwater outlets must be designed so as to allow:
Rainwater outlets are also to be:
Particular care and attention is required to demonstrate the fixing method between the outlet and flow rate restrictors are fitted to achieve a homogenous seal between the waterproofing and the outlet.
Insulation should be isolated from the rainwater outlet:
Drainage discharge provision should be made to ensure:
Insulation specified must be proposed as part of a compatible system from a manufacturer.
The U-value achieved in an inverted roof, greatly depends upon the amount of water that passes through the joints of the insulation and sits on the waterproofing. This is available in test method Appendix C of ETAG 31-1.
Following BS 6229: 2018, it is deemed reasonable to apply an increase 10% correction factor to the thickness of the insulation on what might normally be applied to address the potential reduction in performance of the U-value of the system.
Condensation risk assessments should be undertaken in the roof build up at an early stage to eliminate the potential risk interstitial condensation should calculations show it occur.
Thermal bridge loss factors (for drainage via the water flow reducing layer WRFL and insulation) need to be considered in the U-value calculation and the designer should demonstrate that the necessary U-value will be provided. Measures to achieve this could include the applying the following parameters:
a. Insulation boards butted: 0.04Wday.m-2.K-1.mm-1 (f=1)
b. Insulation boards twice-rebated: 0.03Wday.m-2.K-1.mm-1 (f=0.75)
The warm roof insulation compressive strength must be greater than the proposed loads including additional safety factors for a fully saturated blue roof and allow for the proposed pedestrian surface finish and traffic.
In a warm roof construction, abutting insulation can cause localised depressions in the waterproofing membrane which can promote ponding in these areas which may have a detrimental effect on the lifespan of the waterproofing membrane.
Inverted blue roofs with water storage above the insulation will have to withstand the buoyant up thrust of that insulation. This is often due to issues with the lapping and connection of the Water Flow Reducing Layer (WFRL), allowing significant rates water to pass to the waterproofing layer under the insulation, causing a buoyant effect and providing uplift and therefore floatation on the system which is not acceptable.
It can take some time for this to occur over the lifespan on the building and so robust measures in inverted roofs are required to ensure the integrity of the WFRL are in place.
The water separation layer is not fully waterproof. Water penetration of that layer should be expected during the longer duration storms which can lead to uplift and so conservative assumptions should be taken on the efficacy of the ability of the WFRL to disperse water for the purposes of avoiding floatation.
Without controls, full floatation of the insulation should be expected, as water level in the insulation will be the same as that at the control. In all cases sufficient loading must be applied to any inverted blue roof, such that that uplift of the system due to flotation cannot occur.
This floatation risk may require the designer to consider the depth of insulation that can be used, as every 100mm of insulation thickness will typically require a ballast weight of around 1.0 kN.m-2, which will be in addition to the water loading. Thus, an inverted roof with 200mm of insulation and 100mm water storage will have a total loading of nearly 3.0 kN.m-2.
Structural movement joints are required in large areas of reinforced concrete roofs and decks. Detailing of all movement joints must be provided to demonstrate that ingress or accumulation of water adjacent at or local to the joint will be prevented to limit the risk of frost-thaw action.
Materials forming movement joints must be durable and be able to flex with the waterproofing membrane. Joints must be accessible for inspection and maintenance to allow for a repair in the event of a defect.
Where possible it is best to avoid penetrations for service provisions and where required the designer should look to group the services to minimise the necessary number of penetrations. Back falls are not acceptable at service penetrations.
Waterproofing must allow also for potential movement with the service penetration detailing, be fully bonded and compatible with the service pipe material. Waterproofing will extend 150mm above blue roof surface finished level.
Access and inspections provisions should be incorporated into the design at surface level to allow for routine maintenance to outlets. Surface finishes should be demountable to allow for routine maintenance whilst meeting the requirements to resist wind uplift.
Blue roofs should have a surface finish above the water attenuation layers. This surface finish can be constructed from any suitable permeable pedestrian surface. An impermeable surface can be used but adequate measures should be taken to ensure the water can filter into the blue roof attenuation void. The requirements of the building regulations should be considered with regard to the Building Regulations Part B (Fire Safety), part B4.
Research demonstrates that blue roofs with green roof finishes can be effective. In these circumstances, the green roof build up may be useable as part of the attenuation storage. However, the reservoir storage must be assumed to be full for blue roof design. Silting and biological growth in the reservoir is to be avoided. A root barrier is to be provided.
Excess water accumulation in a green or brown roof system can have an adverse effect on the imposed dead load and planting. In extreme conditions it could change the whole green roof ecosystem, making the system ineffective. Separate maintenance requirements should be considered in a dual green/blue roof to ensure that both systems achieve the minimum required lifespan.
Abutment joints with isolated vertical construction adjacent to the roof or deck slab should not permit the ingress of water to the space below.
Allowance must be made therefore in the waterproofing detailing for anticipated movement between the roof slab or deck and the vertical façade to prevent the waterproof layer shearing. Blue roof to wall façade abutments are often breached by water between the cavity tray and the waterproofing membrane, therefore continuity is essential.
Additional waterproofing maybe required for any water passing the cavity tray to discharge to the blue roof waterproofing membrane. The detailing shall ensure that in the event of a defect in the cavity tray it will not result in moisture ingress into a conditioned space.
Level door access from the blue roof level to occupied spaces should provide:
The designer should check that in all areas there is an upstand height able to provide a waterproofing upstand at least 150mm in height. At critical points, such as the top of drainage slopes, may potentially compromise this upstand height.
At the pre-construction phase, an audit should be established of the surface treatments, architectural features, planters and landscaping that are placed on roof or deck slab. Such detailing will require the necessity for:
Where structures are built off the blue roof slab a suitably designed monolithic upstand or kicker rising above the waterproofing membrane must be provided.
Attenuated water should fall away from any structures built off the roof slab or deck.
A quality assurance and record keeping system should be provided at pre-construction to ensure that standards of workmanship can be demonstrated throughout installation.
1. Main contractor to provide report of testing for integrity of waterproof membrane, including credentials of test engineer, method statement, full description of defects found and their location, evidence of repair and re-test
2. Installer of blue roof system to provide signed certificate of satisfaction with roof finishes over blue roof if these are installed by others
3. Installer of roof system to provide final inspection report of waterproof membrane manufacturer
4. Inverted roofs only: Water Flow Reducing Layer (WFRL)
a) WFRL to be dressed up to finished roof level at all abutments and penetrations noting the requirement for upstands and thresholds to be 150mm above the greatest expected height of the water line datum. Checks to be undertaken to assess the integrity of the WFRL
b) WFRL to be dressed down at all rain water outlets
5. The structural engineer is to provide confirmation that the final construction satisfies the design deflection analysis prepared for drainage provisions
An approved ‘installation contractor’ recognised by the material manufacturer with installers with a demonstrable history of installing blue roof systems are to be permitted to install the manufacturer’s waterproof membrane. Evidence of the manufacturer’s approval of the contractor to install their products should be provided to the warranty surveyor at the earliest opportunity.
Testing is required to demonstrate the integrity of the waterproof membrane undertaken by a suitably qualified and experienced third-party certified test agency independent of the roofing contractor.
Certification should be made available to the warranty surveyor prior to handover.
The testing service provider should provide in their report:
At practical completion of the waterproofing membrane to the blue roof, all areas should be cleared of stored material, site operations and all protection. A thorough, visual and photographic recorded inspection of all areas, including deck surface architectural and landscaped features, must be carried out with representation from the main and roofing contractors in attendance.
A deflection analysis will be required before and after completion by the engineer to confirm the minimum falls are achieved and that no back falls to the waterproofing surface occur.
The developer should have in place an Operation and Maintenance manual (O&M) and should identify areas of risk including:
1. Failure of maintenance and cleansing of rainwater outlets
2. Failure of filter membranes leading to obstruction of storage unit
3. Flotation of inverted roof insulation
4. Blockage of small diameter control holes to drain
5. Removal of controls, leading to unrestricted discharge (risk to wider community rather than the project building)
BS EN 1992-1-1:2004+A1:2014 - Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. General rules and rules for buildings
BS 6229:2018 – Flat roofs with continuously supported flexible waterproof coverings - Code of practice
BS 8102:2009 – Code of practice for protection of below ground structures against water from the ground
BS EN 12056-3:2000 – Gravity drainage systems inside buildings - Roof drainage, layout and calculation.
Technical Guidance Note for the construction and design of Blue Roofs - NFRC
The SuDS Manual - CIRIA 2015
The Flood Estimation Handbook (FEH) 2013 – UK SuDS
Flood Studies Report (FSR)
OFWAT, 2010 - Changes in the frequency of extreme rainfall events for selected towns and cities
Every care was taken to ensure the information in this article was correct at the time of publication. Guidance provided does not replace the reader’s professional judgement and any construction project should comply with the relevant Building Regulations or applicable technical standards. For the most up to date Premier Guarantee technical guidance please refer to your Risk Management Surveyor and the latest version of the Premier Guarantee Technical Manual.